A Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: How Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Side by Side in Across England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents occupy homes only a few metres from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of government figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times across nothing more than a short distance of asphalt, a line of hedges or a barrier. Decades of austerity and lack of funding mean a majority of local authorities now contain a locality classified as one of the poorest in the nation.
The geographical widening of poverty has led to a sharp rise in the quantity of locations where deprived and well-off people find themselves living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the least deprived. This number increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Land
In Grimsby, the gap is the biggest in the UK and starkly obvious. The barrier transcends being just a symbolic divide; it causes tangible problems for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take a quarter of an hour become an sixty-minute detour.
- Access to key amenities like grocery stores, educational facilities and employment centres is hindered.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other issues.
“People strive to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one resident, gesturing towards the corroded metal wall.
Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At a local community centre, workers emphasise that support transcends addresses. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” explained director Tracey Good.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, Nunsthorpe boasts a strong sense and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho ranks among the least deprived 10% overall.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated across the country. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, 63. “You’ll probably find many people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial gap is evident: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side comparable properties fetch about £410,000.
Residents describe a tangible feeling of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” said resident Susan. “In this area our amenities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where prosperity and need are often uncomfortably in close proximity.