Relatives' Anguish Regarding Coastal Degradation Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.